Added: Reem Peng - Date: 10.05.2022 17:54 - Views: 47020 - Clicks: 8793
Try out PMC Labs and tell us what you think. Learn More. Prior research with youth exposed to violence suggests that, in this high-risk population, boys may be victims of sexual teen dating violence TDV and injury as frequently as girls. We sought to replicate these findings with a demographically similar sample and to determine whether the findings could be attributed the high-risk nature of the sample by assessing the impact of violence exposure on sex differences.
We conducted moderation analyses to test whether polyvictimization PV and age moderated the potential sex differences in perpetration and victimization of sexual TDV and injury. No ificant sex differences in victimization were observed regardless of degree of PV. Boys reported more frequent sexual TDV and injury perpetration relative to girls, but only for youth reporting high degree of PV. There were no sex differences in perpetration among low PV youth. These findings suggest boys from high-risk communities may disproportionately perpetrate severe acts of TDV but at this early age they are equally likely to be victimized.
To interrupt the cycle of violence victimization and perpetration, comprehensive violence prevention interventions targeting high-risk youth should be implemented at schools, in homes, and in the community; and they should recognize the potential for girls and boys to be victims of even the most severe forms of TDV. Intimate partner violence IPV and its suspected precursor, teen dating violence TDV , are ificant public health problems that can have multiple deleterious outcomes ranging from physical problems such as gastrointestinal disorders and pelvic inflammatory disease, to mental health and behavioral implications, such as, anxiety, depression, substance abuse, risky sexual behavior, and suicidal ideation Coker et al.
Moreover, experiencing relationship violence during adolescence may predispose youth to future violent relationships Smith et al. Considering the potential lasting consequences of relationship violence at this early age Exner-Cortens et al. Moreover, these rates may differ by age of the population under investigation. Among adults, men appear to perpetrate more than women, while in adolescent populations, the conclusion is opposite — with girls perpetrating TDV as much as, or more than, boys Foshee et al.
These differences may be due to characteristics of the developmental periods Schwartz et al. However, when the definition was more exclusive counting only injurious or fear-inducing acts of violence, the victimization rate for girls was double that of boys. This is consistent with data from nationally representative samples of adults indicating women are more likely to be afraid and more likely to be injured Black et al.
Additionally, a generally stable finding across samples is that girls and women are more frequently victims of sexual violence by a male intimate partner than are males by a female intimate partner Black et al. However, in a test of the moderating effect of age on biological sex differences in TDV, Reidy et al. By age 17, when physical differences would be expected to favor boys, there were no differences in rates of injury victimization, indicating that boys were injured as frequently by girls as were girls by boys.
Likewise, at age 17 there were no ificant differences in sexual violence victimization between sexes, although, a trend toward ificance was identified wherein girls reported more victimization Reidy et al. These findings run counter to expectation based on evidence from large national samples and meta-analyses which generally indicate males perpetrate more sexual violence and injury toward a female intimate partner than do females against their male partners Archer, ; Hamby and Turner, The authors speculated these discrepant findings may be due, in part, to the nature of the sample and the definition of measurement.
The measurement of sexual TDV in this study comprised items reflecting sexually coercive behaviors e. Thus, it seems feasible that assessment of direct physical or forced sexual contact would yield victimization rates higher for girls than boys. Additionally, the authors note that the high-risk nature of the sample i. It is possible prior exposure to violence may engender a phenomenon wherein girls are just as likely as boys to perpetrate severe forms of violence in dating relationships and therefore boys in this population are equally at risk of ificant injury.
Notably, most studies to date have examined TDV rates and sex differences among general adolescent populations Niolon et al. Baskin and Sommers found that over time, youth who had more exposure to community violence were more likely to perpetrate violence, and continued to engage in violent behavior as they got older. Turner et al. Indeed, several studies have suggested girls from high-risk populations may commit violence and aggression in and out of intimate relationships at rates and severity commensurate to boys Niolon et al.
Thus, there is reason to suspect youth exposed to violence may represent a unique high-risk population demonstrating rates of TDV that differ from the general population, and among this population, boys may be equally at risk for sexual and injurious forms of TDV. Given these considerations, it is currently unclear if Reidy et al. Therefore, the purpose of the present study is to replicate and expand upon these findings.
In doing so, we assess sex differences in sexual TDV and injury in a demographically similar sample of youth who vary in their degree of risk conferred by violence exposure. If the findings of Reidy et al. Accordingly, we test the moderating effect of risk as determined by degree of violence exposure on the relationship among biological sex, age, and TDV. Additionally, Reidy et al. Notably, the community from which these youth were sampled is high-risk, as it ranked among the highest 10 U.
These data are ideal for the present investigation because they contain information about the of types of violence exposure e. Moreover, this sample has a diverse ethnic composition similar to that of Reidy et al. Reidy et al. Data were collected from all public school students enrolled in grades 7, 9, and 11 and 12 combined in a school district comprised of 16 schools located in the Northeast United States. Only data from students reporting a dating history during the preceding 12 months were analyzed in the present study. A total of students endorsed a dating history in the preceding 12 months.
The final analytic sample comprised students. See Table 1 for demographic information. A full description of procedures and methods is reported ly Swahn and Bossarte, Demographic information for analytic sample of the adolescents with a history of dating in the year preceding survey.
APV score ranging from 0 to 4 was derived by summing the four different types of violence exposures. All analyses were conducted using Mplus version 7. Due to clustering of data within schools, we controlled for nesting effects using robust maximum likelihood estimation i.
All variables were centered to have a mean of 0 and variance of 1 to reduce multicollinearity Aiken and West, The mean of violence exposure types i. The of students endorsing each type of violence exposure are presented in Table 1.
Of the students, In sum, Table 2 presents the bivariate associations between each of the predictor and criterion variables. All effect sizes are small ranging from. Negative coefficients for sex indicate that boys reported higher scores. In conducting moderation analyses, we first computed regression equations for perpetration outcomes. for sexual and injury perpetration were highly similar: neither evinced a ificant three-way interaction, but both outcomes demonstrated ificant interactions between age and PV and sex and PV, see Table 3.
Explication of these interactions indicated that PV was more strongly associated with sexual and injury perpetration among boys compared to girls Figs. Values in bold are statistically ificant. When we assessed victimization outcomes, there were no ificant interactions at either level. There were no main effects of age for either outcome but there was a positive effect of PV on both sexual and injury victimization. Sex demonstrated a small negative association to injury victimization with boys reporting more victimization than girls.
There were no sex differences for sexual victimization, see Table 3. The goal of the present study was to expand upon prior research Reidy et al. These authors suggested that the findings may have been due to the high-risk nature of the sample, namely, youth who had been exposed to violence Reidy et al. Thus, in the present study we assessed whether the degree of violence exposure i. In doing so, we tested the moderating effect of PV on the relationship among biological sex, age, and TDV i. Our partially confirm the findings of Reidy et al.
There were no ificant three-way interactions for perpetration or victimization. However, a consistent set of findings for sexual TDV perpetration and injury perpetration indicated sex differences existed only among high PV youth, with boys reporting more frequent perpetration. Additionally, PV was most strongly associated with sexual TDV perpetration and injury perpetration among younger adolescents. We found no interaction between age and the effect of biological sex, meaning that sex differences or lack there of in perpetration were consistent from age 11 to 18 in the present sample.
Further, contrary to our expectation that there would be no sex differences among high PV youth, we found sex differences in perpetration existed only among high PV youth while rates of perpetration were comparable among low PV youth. When examining victimization outcomes, sex differences were not moderated by age or degree of PV. In fact, only a main effect of PV was found for sexual TDV victimization, indicating the more types of violence exposure youth reported, the more likely they were to have been a victim of sexual TDV.
And, there was no effect of age or biological sex on this outcome. In other words, boys were forced to engage in a sexual act as frequently as girls and this was as true for the youngest boys as it was the oldest. This finding is generally consistent with Reidy et al. In fact, there was actually a small association between biological sex and injury victimization indicating boys reported more frequent injury victimization than did girls. Interestingly, another recent study of high-risk, low-income, urban, minority youth demonstrated parity in the rates of injury perpetration and victimization for boys and girls Cascardi and Avery-Leaf, Admittedly, this sample was ificantly younger grades 6—8 than the present sample, which could suggest the severity of violence and physical disparity between the two sexes had not yet reached a level sufficient to discriminate rates of injury.
Nonetheless, the rates of injury identified were comparable to prior research Hamby and Turner, ; Reidy et al. Although these authors Cascardi and Avery-Leaf, did not assess historical exposure to violence, they did highlight the high rates of violent crime in the schools and communities, and violence exposure had been reported to be high in similar surrounding urban neighborhoods suggesting their high-risk youth may likely have been exposed to multiple forms of violence Cascardi and Avery-Leaf, ; McDonald et al.
It is possible that gender parity in injury and sexual TDV victimization among these high-risk populations is due to a gendered effect in girls' selective mating in response to chronic stress. Specifically, girls experiencing turbulence and emotional stress associated with early life adversities e.
These relationships tend to be marked by emotional volatility and TDV; and these older, antisocial males are agonists who encourage and exacerbate the delinquent and violent behavior of their younger female partners Cauffman et al.
In other words, girls, but not boys, exposed to adverse experiences in childhood such as violence may be more likely to self-select into romantic relationships that nurtures their violence. Thus, these girls maybe more likely to be violent in dating relationships; their violence would onset earlier; and consequently, they would be more likely to progress to perpetrating more severe forms of violence that may include sexual violence and acts that result in injury.
Of course, our data suggest that violence exposure, while relevant to understanding TDV, does not explain the commensurate frequency of boys' victimization on these more serious indices of TDV. Notably, the community from which these youth were sampled was of particularly high-risk status in terms of having high rates of poverty, unemployment, crime, and single-parent households Swahn and Bossarte, Thus, it seems feasible, based on the level of community risk, that even those youth with no history of violence exposure were exposed to various adverse experiences resulting in chronic stressors that engendered risk for violence.
And, in fact, the relatively small effect sizes of PV indicated violence exposure was only minimally associated with increased risk, consequently suggesting a multitude of other factors contributed equal or greater risk for violence in the present sample. That being said, PV was associated with all observed outcomes and positively correlated with boys' perpetration of both sexual and injurious TDV.
Preventing boys' perpetration of TDV has important health implications not just for their victims, but for the perpetrating boys themselves. Youth who commit violence tend to have worse educational attainment, criminal justice outcomes, and employment status Apel and Sweeten, ; Tanner et al. These factors are key determinants of health CDC, As such, preventing boys' violence perpetration may influence their social determinants of health and improve their long-term health outcomes.
In a related vein, beyond preventing the direct physical and psychological consequences of victimization, understanding boys' victimization may likewise help to prevent future perpetration: it is possible that boys' TDV victimization experiences at early ages contribute to the development of maladaptive attitudes about the propriety of physical and sexual violence in dating relationships.
In fact, a recent multinational study found that boys who were victims of sexual violence were more likely condone violence against a female partner Sumner et al. Attitudes condoning violence are consistently associated with boys' TDV perpetration Foshee et al. Thus, the relatively small sex differences in perpetration identified in the present sample may grow with age increasing the disparity in perpetration as boys physically mature into adulthood. In turn, as these disparities in perpetration grow, sex differences in the frequency of victimization may develop.
Accordingly, sex differences in victimization among these high-risk individuals may not emerge until adulthood when they are fully physically matured O'Leary and Slep, However, rates of injury for girls continued to increase through age The present findings suggest, for boys in particular, developing tailored interventions that target youth who are exposed to multiple forms of violence in their homes and communities may be of benefit given that high PV boys perpetrated more frequently.
The authors found program effects on physical TDV victimization only for adolescents with higher levels of exposure to IPV, but not lower levels of exposure.Sex dating in Kress
email: [email protected] - phone:(453) 488-4533 x 5700
Dating Site Link: 💕 elggvoices.com 💕 Jewish Dating 💕 Nathan Kress And Jennette Mccurdy Dating Porn Videos